
ut today's growing problem in the housing market is different—foreclosures are soaring, while bankruptcies, though clearly on the upswing, are running roughly at half the 2001-2003 pace. The reason: A new bankruptcy law, approved by Congress in 2005 after years of debate, makes it much harder for households to get out from under their consumer debt. The result: More people being forced to walk away from their homes, leaving lenders holding the bag. Perversely, a law intended to help the financial industry may be damaging the housing sector, creditors and borrowers alike.
see had we had the bankruptcy laws of pre 109th congress.. many of these homeowners would still be paying off their homes and not foreclosed.. instead..t hey are having to walk away from their homes, leaving us all with the consequences..and a bunch of failing banks and credit companies.
Do you think the 109th could have done more damage if they tried?
they also passed bush's no down payment inaitive.
Peopel complain about Clinton helping the poor get loans they shouldnt get.
But clinton requied the poor come up with 9,000 dollars on a 150k house.
Bush said why make them raise 9k
so when you see the guy bumming change from you on the street, realize under clinton he would not be able to get a home but under bush he could.
Bush was the one who push for the change to help big business and could of care less about the American citizens and congress when along for the money receive under the table from special interest group.
The banks, credit card companies and lenders wrote this terribly biased law, so they are reaping what they sowed, unfortunalely at the cost of the private housing sector and alot of folks they don't care about.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |